I like gray areas.
I was watching a piece on CNN about the number of sex offenders living in motels. They focused on a stretch of motels in Los Angeles County, California. But I'd wager a guess that it's an issue almost everywhere. They told the horrible story of a motel worker who was forced into a man's motel room and held captive for over 4 hours while he molested her in a number of unspeakable ways. Scary, right? So, then they go on to talk about the frightening number of these people who are living legally in motels, and how we should all be terrified on our next vacation, basically.
At one point, a lawyer guy they interviewed said something about how he wouldn't want to stay there, or let his family stay there.
That may be true....but they fail to make the point clear that this is NOT the Holiday Inn they're talking about. Residential motels are a totally different thing. I bet most of those places haven't seen a "tourist" in several decades. No, those places are reserved for people so destitute, they can't afford to live anywhere else. The working poor, mostly. People who make just enough to be gouged for the weekly motel rates, but not enough to ever be able to save up for the 2 months rent required as a deposit on a legitimate private apartment. So, while CNN is scaring all their whitebread middle-class viewers shitless, the people who are truly affected by this live with it everyday, and are most likely too busy scraping a living together to be glued to 24 hour news stations. Plus, you don't have to tell THEM. They know their situation is dangerous. In Nickel and Dimed, Barbara Ehrenreich said the only time she felt truly afraid during her adventures in poverty was when she was forced to live in a motel like this.
So, that's fuzzy point #1: CNN took the easy story angle (surprise surprise)and ignored the deeper gritty reality. This is yet another example of the injustice that poverty creates here in the Land of the Free.
On to fuzzy point #2.
My Senior year of High School, we had a semester-long social studies class called "Street Law." It was the most interesting class I ever took in High School. We once had this great discussion about whether sex offender notification laws were Constitutional or not. Clearly these offenders are being punished for their crimes twice, because after they serve their time and "pay their debt to society," they are labeled for the rest of their lives. They're denied jobs, housing opportunities and in a number of cases they are harassed, attacked or even killed for it. It's an unpopular debate topic because nobody wants to sound like they're OKing sex offenders. I'm not doing that either. I think the registration laws may be a necessary evil, but I just see the other side of it too. It's not all black and white. There's no way to distinguish the Offenders who are itching to re-offend, and those who made an awful mistake, paid the price and now just want to get on with their life.
That's why when we get teenage offenders or near-offenders where I work, they get MAJOR treatment. We try to inform them of the lifetime of negative consequences they'll have to endure if they get themselves officially labeled as a Sex Offender. Maybe it won't do any good, but even if it keeps one kid from going down that path, that's something, I guess.
At one point, a lawyer guy they interviewed said something about how he wouldn't want to stay there, or let his family stay there.
That may be true....but they fail to make the point clear that this is NOT the Holiday Inn they're talking about. Residential motels are a totally different thing. I bet most of those places haven't seen a "tourist" in several decades. No, those places are reserved for people so destitute, they can't afford to live anywhere else. The working poor, mostly. People who make just enough to be gouged for the weekly motel rates, but not enough to ever be able to save up for the 2 months rent required as a deposit on a legitimate private apartment. So, while CNN is scaring all their whitebread middle-class viewers shitless, the people who are truly affected by this live with it everyday, and are most likely too busy scraping a living together to be glued to 24 hour news stations. Plus, you don't have to tell THEM. They know their situation is dangerous. In Nickel and Dimed, Barbara Ehrenreich said the only time she felt truly afraid during her adventures in poverty was when she was forced to live in a motel like this.
So, that's fuzzy point #1: CNN took the easy story angle (surprise surprise)and ignored the deeper gritty reality. This is yet another example of the injustice that poverty creates here in the Land of the Free.
On to fuzzy point #2.
My Senior year of High School, we had a semester-long social studies class called "Street Law." It was the most interesting class I ever took in High School. We once had this great discussion about whether sex offender notification laws were Constitutional or not. Clearly these offenders are being punished for their crimes twice, because after they serve their time and "pay their debt to society," they are labeled for the rest of their lives. They're denied jobs, housing opportunities and in a number of cases they are harassed, attacked or even killed for it. It's an unpopular debate topic because nobody wants to sound like they're OKing sex offenders. I'm not doing that either. I think the registration laws may be a necessary evil, but I just see the other side of it too. It's not all black and white. There's no way to distinguish the Offenders who are itching to re-offend, and those who made an awful mistake, paid the price and now just want to get on with their life.
That's why when we get teenage offenders or near-offenders where I work, they get MAJOR treatment. We try to inform them of the lifetime of negative consequences they'll have to endure if they get themselves officially labeled as a Sex Offender. Maybe it won't do any good, but even if it keeps one kid from going down that path, that's something, I guess.
posted by Flamingo Jones at 12/29/2005 08:38:00 AM
3 comments
